|
GOVT 290
|
|
| Instructor: Dr. Valerie Lehr 84 Park St., #203 |
Office Hours: Tues., 3:00-4:15 Phone: X5677 |
Course Description: This course is intended to help you learn how political scientists define research questions and conduct research. This semester, your primary goal will be to write a detailed research proposal on a topic concerning women in American politics, basically along the lines of what you will write as a first step if you do a senior thesis in the government department. One of my primary goals will be for you to understand what it means to enter into the conversation of a community of scholars responsibly, both in writing and in conversation. Although many of you may not be planning to become political scientists, we will also explore the ways by which academic work within the discipline is similar to responsible citizen engagement, requiring similar skills in relation to understanding a pre-existing conversation, identifying holes in the research and arguments of various participants in the conversation, and using one's skills to fill in those holes in order to reach either new understandings or more complex understandings. To this end, you will also participate in a multi-college/university project called Democracy Lab. This portion of your work will largely be completed on-line, though we will spend some class time reflecting on this portion of the course and you will have two short writing assignments that grow out of it. The syllabus below outlines the work that you will be doing for our class meetings on the left and the work that you will be doing for Democracy Lab on the right.
Required Texts:
Marsh, David and Gerry Stoker, eds., Theory and Methods in Political
Science, 2nd Edition. Palgrave Macmillan.
Carroll, Susan, ed., Women and American Politics. Oxford University Press.
Course Requirements:
1) Short Response writing: This will count as 15% of your grade.
2) Democracy Lab work: I will check to be sure that you are participating. You
will also need to reflect on this experience as part of your final. Failure
to participate will result in your grade being lowered by .5.
3) Preliminary Bibliography -- 5%
4) Abstracts-- 10%
5 ) Literature Review -- 10%
6 ) Research Proposal -- 20%
7 ) Reader discussion
participant -- 15%
8 ) Group discussion
leader-- 10%
9) Final -- 15%
10) Attendance -- It is very important that you come to class and attend any
scheduled meetings with me. You may not miss more than one class or
appointment, nor may you miss class on a day when you are a reader for another
student. If you do either, your grade will be reduced by 1.0. Missing a third
class and/or appointment or failing to be in class when you are a reader more
than once will result in failure in the course unless there are truly extenuating
circumstances. Although I do appreciate it if you send an email message to
let me know why you are not in class, this does not erase the fact that you
are
absent.
Course Schedule:
| 9/1: Introduction to the course and to deliberative dialogue. | Choose topic for Democracy Lab; go online and register for your topic. |
| 9/8: Readings: Marsh and Stoker, Introduction and
Chapters 1 and 5; Carroll, Introduction; Buker, Eloise, "Is Women's
Studies a Disciplinary or Interdisciplinary Field of Study?" NWSA
Journal 15(1): 73-. Available through Gender Watch.
Write a 2 page response in which you discuss both why it is
has been hard to bring women in the study of political science and why it
is important to do so. |
|
9/15: Marsh and Stoker, Chs. 2 and 4. |
Begin to work on the Democracy Lab portion of the class. Remember, you should log on 3 or more different times for 30-40 minutes. |
| 9/22: Marsh and Stoker, Chs. 6, 7, 8 Carroll, Chs. 7, 8, 9. Write a tw page, typed response in which you address one of the following: 1) A book published in 1981 had the title: Women and Revolution: The Happy Marriage Between Marxism and Feminism." Use Marsh to explain this title and discuss what factors might have made the relationship happier in recent years or 2) Briefly explain deontological theory. Do you beleive that this theory can be beneficial for feminism? Why or why not? |
In order for you to receive credit for this portion of the course, you must post at least four messages by Friday 9/24. |
| 9/29: Carroll, Chs. 4, 5, 6. You should come to class with a preliminary topic for your research. You do not need anything in writing, but you should be able to talk about your topic. | Week 3 of Democracy Lab: As you identify topics that need further research, please consider how gender is connected to your topic. You might propose further research to your group connected to gender, but you should write a 2 page response paper in which you discuss how gender is connected to your topic. As part of this, you might also write a paragraph in which you reflect on how gender is influencing your on-line conversation. |
| 10/6: Marsh and Stoker, Chs. 9, 10, 11, 12. Read one essay connected to your topic. Write an abstract of the essay. Turn in both the abstract and a copy of the essay. As you read, think about how different methodologies might or might not be useful given your topic. We will discuss this in class. | |
| 10/13: I will be out of town. You should email a preliminary bibliography to me before you leave for break. Abstract a 2nd essay. Leave the essay and the abstract with Joyce Sheridan in 82 Park St. | Complete your 2 hours before you leave for break (or during break). |
| 10/20: Conferences: I will post meeting times. Come to your meeting having read an additional 3 or 4 essays. You should be bring a short essay in which you discuss how the essays that you have read fit together and what gaps you are beginning to see in the research on your topic. | |
| 10/27: We will meet for about an hour, after which I will be available to work with anyone who needs assistance. Bring to a class a revised version of the short essay that you wrote for 10/20. Since you now should have read a few more essays, make any changes necessary to reflect this new material. Also, Adam and Matt will bring the articles that they are assigning for next week and pass them out to readers. You will meet with your readers for about 5 minutes and should give them a brief (oral) introduction to your topic. | |
| 11/4: Group Discussions #1, 2. | |
| 11/11: Group Discussions 3, 4. 1st draft of literature review due by 11/12 at 4:30 pm. | |
| 11/18: Group Discussions 5, 6, 7 | This is the last week of democracy lab. Your final exam (a take home that is due in class on 12/9) will ask you to: 1) consider connections and contrasts between your experience with deliberative dialogue and research. You will also draw from the in-class group conversations and 2) discuss the relationship between political science and the study of women. The final is due on 12/11. |
| 12/2: Group Discussions 8, 9. 1st draft of full proposal due | |
| 12/9: Peer review of 1st draft. |
Group Discussion Table:
| Date | Leader | Readers | Leader | Readers |
| 11/4 | 1 | 2,3,4,5 | 6 | 7, 8, 9, 1 |
| 11/11 | 2 | 3, 6, 8, 9 | 7 | 4, 5, 1, 2 |
| 11/18 | 8 | 1, 2, 4, 9 | 3 | 4, 5, 6, 7, |
| 11/18 | 9 | 8 ,3, 5, 7 | ||
| 12/2 | 4 | 1, 2, 6, 7 | 5 | 3, 8, 9, 6 |
Adam = 1
Steve = 2
Celia = 3
Carla = 4
Juanita = 5
Matt = 6
Stephen = 7
Rachel = 8
Susie = 9
Meeting Times for 10/20:
Susie -- 1:15
Celia -- 1: 35
Adam -- 1:55
Matt -- 2:15
Rachel -- 2:35
Juanita -- 2:55
Carla -- 3:15
Stephen
--3:35
Steve--3:55