Instructor:  Daniel W. Koon
Office:       221 Bewkes,
Phone:         229-5494                         Office Hours: Mon. - Thu., 11:00-12:00

Text:          There is not a required text for the lab. However, there are a number of texts that you may find useful in the Reklis collection or the library.

Course overview:

                  The primary purpose of this lab is to introduce you to analog electronics, and to foster a spirit of independence in the lab.

Course requirements:

                  The general format of the lab will be a lecture followed by a lab exercise. Typically the lab exercise will involve building a circuit and analyzing certain aspects of its behavior. You will be required to keep a detailed lab notebook that will be discussed below. This notebook will be a major component of your grade. There will be one exam in the middle of the semester where you will be tested on the lab material covered up to that point. You may be given brief reading or homework assignments on topics covered in the lab. In the second part of the semester each of you will complete an independent project which is also discussed below. There will be a lab practical during the final exam period for the course.

Lab Notebooks:

                  You will be required to keep an accurate and complete lab notebook. For example, if you are testing a circuit, your notebook should include a labeled circuit diagram, a description of what you expect the circuit to do, and any data that you may take. The data should include drawings and descriptions of how waveforms may vary when parameters are adjusted. Note any discrepancies between what you expect your circuit to do and its actual behavior. Your notebook should include all calculations. Answers to questions asked in the lab handout should be thorough and should also be included in your notebook. You should also keep your notes from the prelab in your notebook. Your notebook will be turned in approximately every other week for a grade.

Assignments: 

There will be homework exercises assigned in lab. They will be due the following lab period.

Exam:       There will be one exam given in class covering the material completed before the exam. Questions on the exams will deal with the circuits that you have studied in class, and with any electronics guidelines that you have learned.

Project:

             Toward the end of the semester, you will have an extended independent project of constructing, testing and analyzing an amplifier-based circuit. You will write a formal lab report explaining how the circuit works and some of the design considerations. The introduction should include general information about amplifiers, audio amplifiers in particular. The theory section should include circuit diagrams and derivations of the ideal theoretical response for your amplifier. How do you expect the circuit to behave and why you expect it to behave that way? Your procedure section will explain how you constructed your circuit. It will explain any design choices that you made, and it will explain how you obtained your data. Your data should be presented in the form of graphs (both theory and data). Your analysis should include a comparison of the theory and the data. A draft of your report will be due on Thursday, April 30 at 4:30 pm. One letter grade will be deducted from your final report if your draft is missing or inadequate. I will return the reports the following Monday. The final draft of your report is due on Friday May 8 at 4:30 pm. Late reports will not be accepted.

Lab Practical:

             During the last lab period there will be a lab practical. You will be given a box with a circuit inside, and you will have to determine what the circuit is and document your reasoning. You will be allowed to use your lab notebook.

Grading:

Midterm Exam

25%

Lab notebook

30%

Assignments

10%

Filter Project

20%

Lab Practical

15%

Tentative schedule of topics:

Week

Topic

Week

Topic

1

Ohm's Law

8

Op amps1

2

Loading and Diodes

9

Op amps2

3

RC Circuits

10

Op amps filters

4

RC Filters

11

Project

5

More on Filters

12

Project

6

Diodes and DC Power

13

Project

7

Midterm exam

14

Lab Practical



ACADEMIC HONESTY: SELECTIONS FROM THE SLU STUDENT HANDBOOK

All students at St. Lawrence University are bound by honor to maintain the highest level of academic integrity. By virtue of membership in the St. Lawrence community, every student accepts the responsibility to know the rules of academic honesty, to abide by them at all times, and to encourage all others to do the same.

Responsibility for avoiding behavior or situations from which academic dishonesty may be inferred rests entirely with the students. Claims of ignorance, unintentional error, and academic or personal pressure are not excuses for academic dishonesty. Students should be sure to learn from faculty what is expected as their own work and how the work of other people should be acknowledged. Instructors are expected to maintain conditions which promote academic honesty.

Instructors have the duty to investigate any instance involving possible academic dishonesty and must present evidence of academic dishonesty to the Academic Honor Council rather than make private arrangements with the student involved. Violations of the St. Lawrence University Code of Academic Honor are administered under the constitution of the Academic Honor Council [See Student Handbook for the Constitution].

The primary objective of the University is the promotion of knowledge. This objective can be furthered only if there is strict adherence to scrupulous standards of honesty. At St. Lawrence, all members of the University community have a responsibility to see that standards of honesty and integrity are maintained.

Students who respect academic honesty and who are orderly and meticulous in their treatment of both their own work and the work of others should anticipate no difficulty with cheating, plagiarism, or other forms of academic dishonesty. Borrowing ideas or language from others is acceptable scholarly practice and in many instances actively to be encouraged.

Academic dishonesty generally arises from one of two sources: either a student has knowingly cheated or plagiarized or he/she has been careless or slipshod in discriminating between his/her own work and that of others or in acknowledging sources accurately. These latter difficulties are easily circumvented. Any standard handbook on English usage or term paper writing manual will furnish a methodology as well as appropriate internal reference, endnote, or bibliographical forms (cf., for example, the Harbrace Handbook, A Guide to MLA Documentation, or Writers Inc.).

A major objective of the University is the pursuit of knowledge which can be achieved only by strict adherence to standards of honesty. At St. Lawrence, all members of the community have a responsibility to see that these standards are maintained.

Academic Dishonesty
  1. It is assumed that all work submitted for credit is done by the student unless the instructor gives specific permission for collaboration.
  2. Cheating on examinations and tests consists of knowingly giving or using or attempting to use unauthorized assistance during examinations or tests.
  3. Dishonesty in work outside of examinations and tests consists of handing in for credit as original work that which is not original, where originality is required.
The following constitute examples of academic dishonesty:
  1. Plagiarism: Presenting as one's own work the work of another person - words, ideas, data, evidence, thoughts, information, organizing principles, or style of presentation-without proper attribution. Plagiarism includes paraphrasing or summarizing without acknowledgment by quotation marks, footnotes, endnotes, or other indices of reference (cf. Joseph F. Trimmer,
  2. Handing in false reports on any experiment.
  3. Handing in a book report on a book one has not read.
  4. Falsification of attendance records of a laboratory or other class meeting.
  5. Supplying information to another student knowing that such information will be used in a dishonest way.
  6. Submission of work (papers, journal abstracts, etc.) which has received credit in a previous course to satisfy the requirement(s) of a second course without the knowledge and permission of the instructor of the second course.
Claims of ignorance and academic or personal pressure are unacceptable as excuses for academic dishonesty. Students must learn what constitutes one's own work and how the work of others must be acknowledged.

St. Lawrence students are required to sign the following statement prior to registration for classes: I hereby acknowledge that I have read the above document and I understand my responsibility in maintaining the standards of academic honesty at St. Lawrence University.
Return to Koon's homepage